WASHINGTON (PNN) - March 25, 2024 - In a significant blow to patient autonomy, informed consent has been quietly and unlawfully revoked just 77 years after it was codified in the Nuremberg Code.
On December 21, 2023, as we were frantically preparing for the festive season, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act.
This allowed an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject.
This ruling went into effect on January 22, 2024, which means it’s already standard practice across the Fascist Police States of Amerika.
What is the 21st Century Cures Act? It is a controversial “law” enacted by the 114th FPSA Congress - which is mostly staffed by people who never took the required oath of office and are therefore unauthorized to sit in Congress - in January 2016 with strong support from the pharmaceutical industry.
The Act was designed to accelerate the discovery, development, and delivery of 21st-Century cures, and for other purposes.
Some of the provisions within this “Act” make for uncomfortable reading. For example, the Act supported:
- High-risk, high-reward research [Sec. 2036].
- Novel clinical trial designs [Sec. 3021].
- Encouraging vaccine innovation [Sec. 3093].
This Act granted the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) legal protection to pursue high-risk, novel vaccine research. A strong case could be made that these provisions capture all
the necessary architecture required for much of the evil that transpired over the past four years.
Overturning patient-informed consent was another stated goal of the original Act. Buried under Section 3024 was the provision to develop an: informed consent waiver or alteration for clinical investigation.
Scholars of medical history understand that the concept of informed consent, something we all take for granted today, is a relatively new phenomenon codified in its modern understanding as one of the critical principles of the Nuremberg Code in 1947. It is inconceivable that just 77 years after Nuremberg, the door has once again opened for State-sanctioned medical experimentation on potentially uninformed and unwilling citizens.
According to this “amendment”, the State alone, acting through the NIH, the FDA, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), will decide what is considered a “minimal risk” and most concerning, will determine appropriate safeguards to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of human subjects.
Notice the term “subjects,” not patients, persons, individuals, or citizens but “subjects”. In
asymmetrical power relationships such as clinician/patient, it is understood that the passive “subject” will comply with the rulings and mandates of their medical masters. The use of the term “subjects” also serves to dehumanize. The dehumanization of populations was a critical component of Nazi human experimentation and is an essential step toward denying citizens the
right to have rights.
This ruling also allows researchers and their misguided evangelical billionaire backers to potentially pursue dangerous experimental programs such as Bill Gates’ mosquito vaccines, mRNA
vaccines in livestock, and vaccines in aerosols. This Act encourages these novel and high-risk programs, with medical studies approved as “minimal risk” by the regulators no longer requiring researchers and pharmaceutical companies to obtain patient consent. Yet the histories of pharmacology and medicine are plagued with clinical investigations and interventions that were thought to pose no more than minimal risk to humans but went on to cause immeasurable pain, suffering and death.
This “amendment” represents merely a first tentative step as the FPSA government “tests the waters” to see what it can get away with this egregious and patently unconstitutional and unlawful behavior. Given the lack of attention this ruling received in both the corporate press and independent media, the government is likely to feel emboldened to widen its scope. Thus, this decision represents the beginning of a chilling revisionism in Western medical history, as patient autonomy is again forsaken.
This ruling, to be actioned by potentially corrupt scientists, health bureaucrats, and captured health and drug regulators, is another step toward a dystopian future unimaginable just
five years ago. No doubt the infrastructure to implement this decree is already being constructed by the same groupthink cultists responsible for the nightmarish and unlawful pandemic lockdowns, continuing to place the pursuit of profit and “the greater good” above individual choice, bodily
autonomy and informed consent.
Ed. Note: Remember that neither House of Congress nor the White House nor the Supreme Court are the leaders of this country. They are public servants and they are absolutely subservient to the people of Amerika. Any so-called laws they enact that violate the Constitution are invalid on their face and nobody needs to obey or comply with them. This country belongs to We the People, and it is way past time for them to rise up and overthrow the criminals who have
usurped authority and seek to destroy our way of life. Revolution Now! Independence Forever!
